There was a small
cottage industry in the late 80s/early 90s built on the backs of
shoddy Lovecraft adaptations. There's just something about Lovecraft
that does not translate well to motion pictures. Maybe it's the fact
that Lovecraft is purposefully obtuse with his language. When you mix
that in with his patented “dude going nuts” story line, you have
a piece of fiction that simply clashes with the idea of tying it all
to one singular vision. It's rare that we get a full-on description
of any of the eldritch beasties his protagonists stumble upon and
even if we do, it's difficult to know how truthful that account
actually is. It's coming from a dude going nuts, after all. One has
to wonder if Lovecraft himself even knew what the hell he was writing
about. I wouldn't be surprised to learn that the creator of
Nyarlathotep couldn't draw an accurate picture of it on paper.
But this is the
movies, damn it, and we need to see it and see it good. This reduces
the nightmarish creatures of Lovecraft's fiction into rubber suit
monsters or badly animated puppets. Lovecraft is too weird, too
abstract, too damn vague to ever really translate to the screen. So
what we get are not so much “Lovecraft adaptations”, but rather
“Lovecraft inspirations”. Some of them are quite good, like
RE-ANIMATOR or FROM BEYOND. They're good films inspired by
Lovecraft's stories, but as adaptations… well, they fail horribly.
So it's best to go
into any Lovecraft adaptation with a full understanding of what
you're getting yourself into. Expect the settings to be different.
Expect the plot to be a mishmash of several stories, not just the one
the movie is named after. Expect the film to be filled with violence
and gore, despite Lovecraft rarely indulging in either. Expect rubber
monsters. Lots and lots of rubber monsters. Oh and nudity. Because we
all know how much Lovecraft loved sex.
Now that we got that
out of the way, here's LURKING FEAR, a 1994 *ahem* adaptation of
Lovecraft's 1922 short story. The overall gist is the same. Monsters
living underground rise up during storms to terrorize a secluded
village. As if that wasn't enough, writer/director C. Courtney Joyner
tosses in a bit of The Shadow Over Innsmouth for good measure. And a
bunch of violence and gore. And rubber-faced monsters. No sex though.
You'll have to get your rocks off someplace else, unless you're
really into poorly choreographed mud wrestling.
John Martense
(played by Blake Bailey, aka the guy who looks distractingly like
Sawyer from Lost) has just been released from prison. He tracks down
a friend of the family, a crook named Knaggs. Knaggs informs John
that there's a body buried up in the Leffert's Corners graveyard.
Inside the hollowed out chest cavity of the body is a whole lotta
money, an insurance plan set up by John's now deceased crook of a
father. So off sets John to collect the dough. Unfortunately, three
gangster-types (one of whom is played by the great Jon Finch) are in
pursuit, also looking for the money.
But even more
unfortunately, the town of Leffert's Corners has a rubber-faced
monster problem. After her sister was nabbed a few years back, a
pistol-packing hottie named Cathryn (the always great Ashley
Laurence) has come back to settle the score. Cathryn has assembled
herself one hell of a team to deal with the pesky monsters, a team
that consists of a pregnant woman (she's the bait, by the way), one
local, a nervous priest and a drunk doctor played by Jeffrey Combs.
Not much of a team, it turns out, but you know what this team has a
lot of? It isn't brains, brawn or balls. Nope, they have a fuck load
of dynamite and it's wrapped all over the place. When the ghouls
ascend from beneath the town church to go a huntin', they'll be
shambling right into Armageddon.
Shame then that John
shows up, the gangsters show up, the monsters show up, people fight,
hostages are taken, graves are dug up, money isn't found, floors
collapse, fist fights happen, some people get shot or eaten or both,
bug-eyed rubber-faced monsters walk around like zombies, and the
whole damn movie just tumbles into inanity.
I say “shame then”
because I actually really liked the set-up for the film. I would have
preferred the whole monster thing to have happened a bit later,
preferably after John's character and situation had been set up.
There's a lot of fun to be had when characters just stumble into
confusing, dangerous situations they have to quickly adapt to. FROM
DUSK TILL DAWN did that thing really well. But we already know about
the monsters from the first minute on and the way the film moves
between the two story lines (the preparation at the church and John's
journey to Leffert's Corners with the gangsters in pursuit) doesn't
leave us with a lot of time to gain our footing in the narrative. I
mean, who is our main protagonist here? Is it the woman whose sister
was killed during the first five minutes or is it John, the character
who is given voice over narration duty and introduced shortly before
the 10 minute mark?
What I'm trying to
say is that the two sides of the narrative don't exactly mesh well
together. Characters from the gangster plot thread never feel like
they're fully invested in the monster plot thread and vice versa. We
have the gangsters constantly venturing outside to dig up the money
even though they know monsters are coming out of the ground to grab
them. The characters in the monster plot thread just have to stand
around and kill time until someone can manage to wrestle a gun away
from the gangsters and hold them hostage. Then the gangsters turn the
tables and the going outside bits happen again. Then the tables turn
again and we get some monster prep. It's the seesawing between the
two that saps most of the energy from the film.
And that really
sucks because LURKING FEAR is the right kind of cheese for a low
budget horror film. It's got a great cast (I already mentioned
Laurence, Finch and Combs, but Allison Mackie, Paul Mantee and
Vincent Schiavelli are also on board), ridiculous monsters, the kind
of last minute plot twist that has you frantically facepalming and
more corny fistfights than a whole bucket of Cynthia Rothrock movies.
I liked enough of the film to stay with it until the end, but as
whole, it's terribly underwhelming. And that, more or less, sums up
95% of every direct-to-video Lovecraft adaptation ever made.
No comments:
Post a Comment
SPEAK YOUR MIND