Meet Georges Bonner,
surgeon, aspiring sculptor, discoverer of eternal life. He's 104
years old, though he barely looks 45. What's his secret? Well,
science, of course. In particular, a special kind of surgery
involving a gland replacement. And if you find yourself getting a
little older a little quicker than normal, just drink some of his
patented green elixir, the perfect impediment to slowly rotting to
death as your body's cells play catch up with your actual age.
Georges' next gland
transplant is quickly coming due and to conduct the surgery, he calls
upon his old friend and colleague in dastardly science, Dr. Ludwig
Weiss. Unfortunately, Ludwig has recently suffered a stroke,
crippling his right hand, and worse, the back-up glands Georges had
in storage have gone off. So what is Georges to do? Not having the
transplant means that his body will age rapidly, turning to dust in a
matter of minutes. There's only one thing he can do.
Georges has a
complicated romantic history with a pretty socialite named Janine.
The two have recently started seeing one another again, a development
which annoys Pierre Gerrard, a French surgeon (this film takes place
in Paris in the year 1890, by the way). After speaking with Ludwig,
Pierre agrees to do the procedure, thinking that it is a routine
medical operation needed to save Georges' life. However, once he
learns the truth of Georges' condition, he quickly changes his mind.
So Georges has little recourse. If moral persuasion isn't enough,
maybe a little blackmail will do the trick. But first, he has to
obtain a shiny new gland…
How cool does that
sound?
Trust me, on paper
THE MAN WHO COULD CHEAT DEATH sounds pretty great, but on film, it's
one long bore. A remake of Ralph Murphy's much better thriller THE
MAN IN HALF MOON STREET, Terence Fisher's film is a lethargic
melodrama for most of its running time, only picking up steam at
around the 40 minute mark. That's around the time Ludwig and Georges
begin to butt heads. Georges is willing to kill to get a new gland
for his operation, but Ludwig refuses to play any part in it. For a
good ten minutes (and I mean good), the film becomes an interesting
treatise on mortality, the ethics of life extension and the morality
of selfishness. All of the films underlying philosophical concerns
are laid bare in these scenes, with great dialogue and a passion in
the performances that is not found anywhere else during the films 83
minute running time.
But then the film
quickly descends back down into routine melodrama for another long
half hour stretch of lifeless performances, stiff dialogue and
languid pacing. The film ends with a kind of fevered ferocity so out
of place with the rest of the film that it almost feels like someone
swapped out the final reel of this film with the final reel from a typical Italian Gothic
horror film. This has one of those “shrieking women in a burning
building” endings that generally gets my pulse pumping, but by the
time sparks started to fly, all of my patience had run out. I just
sat there, waiting for it all to end, feeling like I too had aged 100
years over the course of those 83 minutes.
No comments:
Post a Comment
SPEAK YOUR MIND